Page 7 - jdrogers2017ba
P. 7

World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2017                                                    400




                       In theory, the concept of an aqueduct utilizing gravity flow had numerous advantages over
               any  of  the  competing  rivers  then  under  consideration.  Owens  Lake,  the  terminus  of  the  river’s
               natural  flow,  was  at  an  elevation  of  3560  feet  above  sea  level,  while  downtown  Los  Angeles'
               elevation of just 300 feet allowed for a drop of more than 3,260 feet. After pouring over topographic
               profiles they decided to situate the aqueduct’s intake 12 miles north of Independence near elevation
               3900, and convey the water an incredible 233 miles southward. This would allow a hydraulic grade
               of over 15 feet per mile, more fall than any other aqueducts preceding it. The surplus hydraulic
               energy head meant that sag pipes (often referred to as inverted siphons in the media of the era) and
               pressure tunnels could be utilized to traverse difficult terrain.
                       A natural problem solver blessed with charisma, Mulholland could be very stubborn about
               principles. We can catch a glimpse of this character trait in the long-standing feud between himself
               and his mentor Fred Eaton, who had preceded him as Superintendent of the L.A. Water Company.
               It was Eaton who conceived the idea of capturing the waters of the Owens River and conveying this
               precious resource to Los Angeles.  With inside knowledge that the citizens of Los Angeles might
               vote approve a future proposal to construct a mighty aqueduct to tap the Owens River, in March
               1905 Eaton purchased 20,000 acres of land in the Upper Owens and Long Valleys from the Rickey
               Land & Cattle Co., for $450,000 ($22.50 per acre). Within a year and a half he sold 8,000 acres of
               his  holdings  to  the  City  at  cost  ($22.50/acre),  but  retained  12,000  acres  in  Long  Valley,  which
               included the prime site for a dam that could retain a storage reservoir storing 260,000 acre-feet with
               a dam 140 ft high. For 25 years Eaton tried in vain to sell his Long Valley property to the City,
               initially  for  $750,000,  or  about  $62.50  per  acre.  Eaton  profiting  at  the  public  expense  was  not
               something  a  man  like  Mulholland  could  accept,  and  he  exerted  pressure  to  hold  off  on  its
               acquisition. After Mulholland retired, the property went into foreclosure and the City purchased the
               land  for  $650,000  in  December  1932.  In  1938-41  the  Department  of  Water  &  Power  (DWP)
               constructed  Long  Valley  Dam.  Just  126  feet  high,  it  retains  Crowley  Lake,  the  largest  storage
               facility on the Los Angeles Aqueduct, capable of retaining 183,650 ac-ft

               Feasibility studies. Mulholland asked the City’s Board of Water Commissioners for $1.5 million
               to  undertake  engineering  studies  of  the  scheme  (Kelly,  1916).  These  funds  were  quickly  made
               available, a real testimony to Mulholland’s credibility and the serious nature of the City’s desperate
               need for water. In the spring of 1905, the Water Commissioners appointed a Board of Engineers to
               investigate all of the potential sources of additional water for the City. The panel was comprised of
               Mulholland,  J.B.  Lippincott  and  O.K.  Parker  (when  Lippincott’s  contract  with  the  Reclamation
               Service ended in 1906, he was hired by Mulholland as Assistant Chief Engineer of the Aqueduct).
               The panel’s likely purpose was to demonstrate that the Owen River presented the best alternative,
               and  the  appointment  of  Lippincott  had  strategic  significance,  given  his  position  with  the
               Reclamation Service then overseeing studies of the Owens River (Hoffman, 1981). The alternatives
                                                     2
                                                                                                        2
                                                                                2
               including the San Gabriel River (283 mi ), Santa Ana River (728 mi ), Mojave River (211 mi ) and
                                         2
               the  Kern  River  (2,345  mi ).  Conveying  water  from  the  Mojave  or  Kern  Rivers  would  require
               tunnels of unprecedented length to transport water through Cajon Pass (for the Mojave) or either
               Tejon or Tehachapi Passes (for the Kern).
                       It  was  the  Owens  River  that  exhibited  enormous  potential.  Its  expansive  watershed

               encompassed 2,604 square miles, and its water could be diverted southward from a much higher
               elevation than the any of the alternatives. The fact that Mulholland had never constructed hydraulic
               structures, such as pressure tunnels and sag pipes, never seemed to diminish his confidence that
               these things could be accomplished by a judicious review of the published literature on the subject.








                                           World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2017
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12