Santa Clarita Valley History In Pictures
> CASTAIC LAKE WATER AGENCY

Santa Clarita Water Company Dissolved.


The two water companies that Bill Bonelli started in 1949 and 1956 officially ceased to exist October 31, 2017. They died without any fanfare, their fate having been determined 19 years earlier when the Castaic Lake Water Agency bought all assets of the private Santa Clarita Water Company for $63 million. But it seems appropriate to add the formal dissolution to the historical record.

As a corporate entity, Santa Clarita Water — the merger company of Bonelli's Bouquet Canyon Water Company (1949) and Solemint Water Company (1956) — had been inactive since August 31, 1998, when CLWA absorbed its assets and became its owner. New legislation in Sacramento allowed CLWA to provide the same type of retail water services that the old Santa Clarita Water Company had provided, and in the same geographical area, and with the same equipment. Even though CLWA called its new retail division "Santa Clarita," it had nothing legally to do with the old corporate entity known as Santa Clarita Water Company.

But the corporate entity continued to exist on paper, and CLWA owned it. On September 17, 1999, CLWA converted this no-asset corporation to a nonprofit corporation that didn't do anything. And so it sat until October 25, 2017, when the CLWA board voted to dissolve it.

(For the detail-oriented, Bonelli merged his Bouquet company into his Solemint company in 1973 and changed Solemint's name to "Santa Clarita." So, the corporation under discussion here, Santa Clarita Water Company, carries Solemint's incorporation date of June 11, 1956.)

The dissolution of the old Santa Clarita Water Company entity is one of many administrative steps being taken in the run-up to the dissolution of CLWA itself, along with the Newhall County Water District. On legislative action signed into law October 15, 2017 (which did generate considerable fanfare), CLWA and NCWD are to be dissolved and replaced by a new Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency by mid-2018.

Was there a requirement to dissolve the old corporate entity, Santa Clarita Water Company, at this time? No, it could have continued to exist on paper and would have become an asset (or, non-asset) of the new water agency. But, in the words of the CLWA staff report, Santa Clarita Water Company "serves no purpose and requires staff time to maintain."

Note: Missing page numbers correspond to pages that were intentionally left blank. They have been omitted here.


Download original pdf here.
CASTAIC DAM & RESERVOIR; CLWA
("Castaic Lake")

thumbnail

History of Santa Clarita Water Co./Division

thumbnail

Dissolution of Santa Clarita Water Co.
10-25-2017

thumbnail

Construction Starts 1966

thumbnail

Construction 1967-70 x10

thumbnail

Towner Mfg. Constrution Report 1969

thumbnail

Castaic Lake: 50-Year Operating Agreement 1969

thumbnail

Aerial 12/5/1970

thumbnail

Boat Launch 1972

thumbnail

Dorn at Afterbay Opening 5/22/1972

thumbnail

Dorn-Haddad 5/22/1972

thumbnail

Main Lake Opens 6/26/1972

thumbnail

CLWA Facility 1980

thumbnail

"Dinocroc" 2004

thumbnail

Huell Howser:
Groundwater Banking 2008

thumbnail

Drought 2015

thumbnail

Recycled Water Main Extension, Central Park, 12/13/2017


thumbnail

Aqueduct Ruptures in AV, 1971

RETURN TO TOP ]   RETURN TO MAIN INDEX ]   PHOTO CREDITS ]   BIBLIOGRAPHY ]   BOOKS FOR SALE ]
SCVHistory.com is another service of SCVTV, a 501c3 Nonprofit • Site contents ©SCVTV
The site owner makes no assertions as to ownership of any original copyrights to digitized images. However, these images are intended for Personal or Research use only. Any other kind of use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly publication in any medium or format, public exhibition, or use online or in a web site, may be subject to additional restrictions including but not limited to the copyrights held by parties other than the site owner. USERS ARE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE for determining the existence of such rights and for obtaining any permissions and/or paying associated fees necessary for the proposed use.
comments powered by Disqus