Page 7 - cp19331935delinquency

-•five--
slender budget to provide all of the headquarters facilities, telephones, supplies

and mimeographing.

The staff of the Probation Department, under the active leadership of Kenyon

Scudder, Karl Holton and Kenneth Beem, backed by the powerful Coordinating Councils,

were driving in ou the problem from another approach. Their efforts in the field were

directed toward home contacts in delinquency infested areas, reaching the pre-delin-
quents as well as the delinquents, counseling with parents, suggesting remedial action

and bolstering home morale. This program absorbed several hundred workers who were

designated as delinquency prevention workers (D. P.} to distinquish them from the

playground workers (P. G.), since the requirements and approach of each group were

essentially different.

Importance was attached at the outset to keeping accurate reports, records and

statistics on the progress of the work. This was fortunate as the entire nation became

interested in the experiment. Federal officials in Washington eagerly awaited the

weekly and monthly progress reports. The National Recreation Association was helpfully

alert and intensely interestedo All subsequent nation-wide developments under suc-

ceeding State and Federal agencies were based on the organization methods and systems

conceived in the Los .Angeles County work of 1933. The reporting, record keeping and

statistical sections~ under the supervision of c. E. Triggs, E. D. Golden, Charles

Brander and M. T. Falso.

The necessity for a training program was also considered of major importance at

the beginning. Practically all of the workers were totally devoid of actual training

and experience in, or knowledge of, a well rounded recreation program for all ageso

There was interest, enthusiasm and innate ability. These were potent elements to work

with but they needed guidance, instruction and development from the ground up. So a

system of weekly recreation training institutes covering the entire county was organ-

ized and conducted by Marion E. Miller, a recreation executive of ten years' experience

who had specialized in institutes and activities organization in Pennsylvania. She

carried on ten weekly sessions at centrally located schools, with an average enroll-

ment of 800 workers, continuing this work until Mlrch, 1934, when she was appointed

by Mr. Reid as administrator of the project. A manual of year-round recreation ac-